Play everyone twice but 2 teams - SMU (home only) and Tulane (road only).
Who is the genius that came up with this idea? Did they not see what the committee did the past two years in shafting the league? How does it benefit one of the few legitimate teams that you have to not play the best team in the league on the road? SMU, Cincy, and maybe Tulsa were the only conference road games that were opportunities at a "good win" last year.
Temple blew the @SMU game in the second half, but it probably didn't hurt them much since they lost to a good team in a tough environment. Those are exactly the type of lowish risk, high reward games that we need. And instead they get to play ECU, Houston, and USF twice. Embarrassing.