Team A, currently projected a 5 seed:
Top 100 RPI wins: 19, 28, 35, 49, 56, 58, 72, 75, 88, 94 (3 teams currently projected to make the Tournament)
RPI losses: 3, 5, 42, 80, 89, 121 (3/6 teams currently projected to make the Tournament)
Team B, currently projected an 11 seed:
Top 100 RPI wins: 1, 28, 73, 80, 98, 99 (2 teams currently projected to make the Tournament)
RPI losses: 4, 5, 23, 28, 45, 93, 160 (5/7 teams currently projected to make the Tournament)
Team A has more wins against decent/NIT type teams, 1 more win against projected NCAA Tournament teams, and 2 wins against bubble teams that won't make the Tournament.
Team B has more losses, but the majority of their losses are to projected NCAA Tournament teams. They also beat the top RPI team.
Is it me, or is there not really much of a difference between those two resumes?
Top 100 RPI wins: 19, 28, 35, 49, 56, 58, 72, 75, 88, 94 (3 teams currently projected to make the Tournament)
RPI losses: 3, 5, 42, 80, 89, 121 (3/6 teams currently projected to make the Tournament)
Team B, currently projected an 11 seed:
Top 100 RPI wins: 1, 28, 73, 80, 98, 99 (2 teams currently projected to make the Tournament)
RPI losses: 4, 5, 23, 28, 45, 93, 160 (5/7 teams currently projected to make the Tournament)
Team A has more wins against decent/NIT type teams, 1 more win against projected NCAA Tournament teams, and 2 wins against bubble teams that won't make the Tournament.
Team B has more losses, but the majority of their losses are to projected NCAA Tournament teams. They also beat the top RPI team.
Is it me, or is there not really much of a difference between those two resumes?
